deneme
85740 items (85740 unread) in 36 feeds
What do we call something 8 years old? Not new, not a baby, not even a toddler. While there is speculation about when the next round of “Not legacy TLD’s” will be introduced, let’s take a look back at the first 7 to launch in 2014. In a post I wrote, “It’s a profit deal” […]
The post 8 years later, a look at the first 7 new gtlds appeared first on TheDomains.com.
Here are some of the new features I like and an upcoming feature I’m looking forward to.
Dan.com rolled out a new user interface last week. Many of the changes are small (but nice) usability adjustments. But there are also new and updated features, and a big one is coming in a couple of weeks.
Here are some of the new features:
Sort by extension – This is helpful if you want to update your pricing for a particular extension, such as .xyz. Or, if you let a bunch of domains in an extension expire, sorting by extension can make it easier to remove them from your Dan.com account.
Bulk actions – Change pricing information, sales page settings, etc., for multiple domains at once.
New verification nameserver – Dan.com provides two ways to verify your ownership of domains previously added to Dan.com by another user. One is to add a DNS TXT record, and the other is to add a third nameserver. Unfortunately, its previous .hosting nameserver didn’t work with some registrars. So it added another nameserver that users can add to their domains that all registrars accept.
There’s also a forthcoming feature that should be very helpful. The company tells me that categories will be added in the coming weeks, allowing you to put domains into groups and apply different settings to them. A couple of weeks ago, on the DNW Podcast, I mentioned how you can’t use a different pricing strategy for domains at Dan.com. Right now, I have my default set to BIN, but I can’t change a high-priced domain to BIN + Make Offer. The category feature will allow you to put a group of domains into its own category and apply a different sales page type (such as BIN + Make Offer) to domains in that category.
Post link: Dan.com’s refresh and an upcoming improvement
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:The number of cybersquatting complaints, and the number of successful cybersquatting complaints, were down in .uk last year, according to new data from local registry Nominet.
Nominet said that its Dispute Resolution Service, which has a monopoly on .uk disputes, handled just 548 cases in 2021, the lowest number in the 20-year history of the DRS.
Only 43% of the complaints resulted in the domain being transferred, Nominet said. That’s down from 46% in 2020, 47% in 2019 and 49% in 2018, it said.
The trends fly in contrast to the UDRP, as least in WIPO’s experience in 2021, where cases were soaring.
General counsel Nick Wenban-Smith said in a press release:
Despite the worldwide shift towards online activity during the pandemic, and WIPO disputes on the increase, we haven’t seen a parallel pick up in the number of .UK domain name disputes for the past two years, but instead are reporting a record low in Complaints filed since the DRS launched back in 2001. We hope this is a result of our continued efforts to make .UK a safe place to be online.
Nominet has some pretty strict takedown practices in place — it will suspend a domain if the police’s intellectual property crime unit tells it to, which could clearly have an impact on the need to employ the DRS.
The post Cybersquatting cases down in .uk first appeared on Domain Incite.
Related posts:Both parties made allegations that are difficult to prove.
The domain name dao.com has become more valuable in the past year with the rise of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, a type of blockchain-based organization. So it was interesting to see a UDRP cybersquatting claim against the domain name.
It’s a confusing and complex case, too. Daodao Holding LLC and Daodao Group Company Limited filed the complaint against Nie Zhenxiang.
The parties made several claims that the other parties say are false. There are allegations of domain theft and faked documents. And the main Complainant was just organized as a company last year.
In the end, panelist Fernando Triana found that the Complainant failed to show rights in a trademark that the domain infringes on and that it failed to show the domain owner lacked rights or legitimate interests. He denied the transfer request.
I doubt Triana was going to get to the bottom of all of the allegations in a simple UDRP case. This type of dispute would need to be settled in a competent court.
Post link: Cybersquatting claim against valuable DAO.com domain denied
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:One would expect a generic domain such as Canteen.com to be representing a regional store, but the truth is much bigger. According to their web site at Canteen.com: Canteen is a family of companies, serving clients across the country with both national and regional offerings for our markets, dining, coffee and vending lines of business. […]
Copyright DomainGang
DAO stands for Decentralized Autonomous Organization and in the era of blockchain, smart contracts, and crypto it’s one powerful acronym. The matching domain name, DAO.com, was the focus of a UDRP between two Chinese individuals.The domain was acquired in 2010 from Rick Latona’s outfit DigiPawn. Daodao Holding LLC and its operators alleged that the domain […]
Copyright DomainGang
A jewelry seller, a machine parts company, and an irrigation business bought domain names.
Sedo didn’t have many big sales this past week (at least ones it could publish.) Its top sale was €15,000 for rete. However, it had some nice end user sales that I’ve detailed below.
Here’s a list of end user domain name sales that just completed at Sedo. You can view previous lists like this here.
Spacegoods.com $10,000 – This “coming soon” site will be for wellness products.
Fuje.com $9,950 – Fuje is a jewelry seller.
7solutions.com $8,000 – EJPS IT Service is an IT company in the Netherlands. This might be for a client.
LifeScan.kr $8,000 – LifeScan provides tools for people to manage diabetes. It uses the domain LifeScan.com.
Aisti.com $5,800- Aisti Corporation Oy in Finland provides green building materials.
Stake .jp £5,500 – This is an online gambling site using bitcoin.
Aresia.com $5,145 – The Whois record shows Resolis in France. When I Google that, I find an organization with very broad claims, including something to do with the environment. The domain doesn’t resolve yet.
Fill.it €5,000 – Fillsystems srls is a tech company in Italy. It forwards this domain to fillsystems.it.
MT24.com €4,500 – Maschinenteil24 is a machine tooling/parts company. This domain forwards to maschinenteil24.de.
Delikatessenversand.de €3,000 – Google translate says this domain is German for “delicatessen shipping”. It forwards to the website for Dinses Culinarium, a gourmet food store.
MediaAisle.com $2,885 – Lowblaw is a grocery chain in Canada. I think this diversified company also owns a media business.
Configo.com £2,500 – Configo Software Ltd in Great Britain bought this domain.
Sift.kr $2,500 – The domain now resolves to a page that says “Sift Seoul” and has images of flour being sifted, along with nature scenes. The title tag says “sift. refining ideas.”
AgroCanarias.com $2,500 – Agro Canarias SL is an irrigation company that uses the domain agrocanariassl.es.
LocalFordDealders.com $2,399 – R & R Advertising in Michigan is listed in Whois.
WePermit.com $2,285 – Permit.com acquired this domain.
KenectRecruitment.com $2,250 – Kenect Recruitment in England uses the .co.uk version of this domain.
Post link: Here are the latest end user domain sales
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:It’s a sad reality: Domain names expire every day because their registrants pass on and no one takes over the account. In the case of ByteCraft.com, the domain was registered in 1994 by three Canadians that had formed the company “Byte Craft” in 1976. One of them was the founder, Walter Banks. According to archived […]
Copyright DomainGang
February 22, 2022
EARN IT Act moves forwardThe Senate Judiciary Committee has approved a new version of the highly controversial Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act (EARN IT Act). First introduced in March 2020, EARN IT Act pares back the immunity protections under Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, making them contingent on the ability of online service providers to tackle the online proliferation of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). To be clear, Section 230 does not protect online service providers from being held liable for the possession or transmission of CSAM. Intermediaries are already required to report any CSAM on their servers and can be criminally prosecuted for knowingly facilitating the spread of CSAM. The EARN IT Act goes beyond these measures and creates obligations for tech platforms to proactively look for CSAM. Encouraging platforms to scan all user-transmitted or stored messages, photos, and files raises serious privacy concerns.
The monitoring obligations would require companies that have built encryption into their products to build special backdoor access – a move that is likely to discourage the use of encryption and weaken the security of online communications. During hearings about the bill, Sen. Blumenthal tried his best to downplay the impact on encryption, going so far as to say that “Big Tech is using encryption as a subterfuge to oppose this bill..” The 2022 version of the bill was amended to add a provision to prohibit encryption from being used as the sole justification for lawsuits. However as Sen Blumenthal has clarified, while the Act “does not prohibit use of encryption or create liability for using encryption”, evidence of use of encryption to further illegal activity can potentially expose providers to liability for offering it.
By requiring providers to scan their services and turn that material over to law enforcement, EARN IT Act pushes providers into acting as government agents. However, the evidence obtained from providers conducting unconstitutional warrantless searches is inadmissible in courts and paradoxically will lead to fewer convictions of child predators. The EARN IT Act exposes intermediaries to a patchwork of different state laws. If the current version passes, tech platforms can be sued for images that are posted by users on their platforms. It allows for both civil and criminal lawsuits against service providers “regarding the advertisement, promotion, presentation, distribution, or solicitation of child sexual abuse material” and leaves it up to states to set the relevant legal standard for prosecution. Human rights groups have also raised concerns about the unintended consequences of the bill, drawing comparisons to SESTA/FOSTA — the 2018 bill that was meant to limit sex trafficking on the internet. Though intended to prevent sex trafficking, FOSTA-SESTA has been criticized for its impact on deplatforming of sex workers, disproportionately affecting LGBTQ communities and driving illegal actors undergound and beyond the reach of law.
Given its impact on free speech and online security it is not surprising to see civil liberties, digital rights, and big tech groups come together to oppose the EARN IT Act. More than 60 organizations have signed a letter urging the Judiciary Committee to oppose the legislation. Regardless of what happens with the EARN IT Act, balancing protecting users’ online privacy and security, and providers’ liability is a tough act and these tensions are here to stay.
The Slow, Slow Process of ICANN ReformAccountability reforms were the quid pro quo for ICANN’s release from the supervision of the U.S. government in October 2016. One of those reforms required the corporation to revise and improve its Independent Review Process. The Independent Review Process (IRP) is the Supreme Court of ICANN’s non-governmental system of governance. It is supposed to be an accountability mechanism that provides for independent third-party review of Board or staff actions alleged to be inconsistent with ICANN’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws. One of its key functions is to ensure that ICANN does not stray from its limited mission. The new Bylaws required ICANN to create a Standing Panel of prospective judges, from which members shall be selected to preside over specific IRP disputes.
ICANN has slow-walked the reform. Five and a half years after the transition, and four years after creating a “process roadmap” for appointing the Standing Panel, ICANN on Feb 17 announced the creation of (wait for it) a committee to “support the SOs and ACs in proposing a slate of nominees” for the Standing Panel. Seven individuals were named to an “Independent Review Process (IRP) Community Representatives Group.” The group, whose members are listed here, is responsible for “supporting the SOs and ACs in proposing a slate of nominees.” ICANN’s announcement says “The IRP is an essential mechanism for holding the ICANN Board and the organization accountable, and the seating of an omnibus standing panel to hear these claims is an important component of achieving a consistent, binding outcome.”
The ball is now in the court of ICANN’s Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees – or is it in the hands of the Community Representatives Group? – and ICANN’s announcement invites us to visit this website, which has not been updated since November of 2020, to “Follow the progress.”
The post The Narrative: Anti-Section 230 bill advances; ICANN’s judicial branch appeared first on Internet Governance Project.
Nominet reports a record low number of cases filed.
Cybersquatting disputes in the .uk namespace are on their way down. Graphic from Nominet report.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) publishes annual data about its cybersquatting case counts under UDRP, usually reporting record case counts.
But this can be misleading. There are many organizations that handle cases under UDRP. Because of forum shopping, you need to look at all of the forums for deciding these cases.
Also, record gross numbers don’t take into consideration how many domains are registered. The number of registered domains keeps going up, and hundreds of new top level domains have been introduced in the past decade.
Looking at just one top level domain in which all cases are handled by one organization might better represent the prevalence of cybersquatting.
Nominet, the organization that manages the .uk namespace (including .co.uk domains), said today that cybersquatting cases in .uk are at an all-time low, not an all-time high.
Entities filed just 548 cases under the .uk dispute policy last year and only 43% of these resulted in a domain transfer. This is despite the Nominet policy being more Complainant-friendly than UDRP because it only requires the domain to be registered or used in bad faith, not registered and used in bad faith. Also, with the introduction of second level .uk domains, you’d expect this number to go up, not down.
So perhaps the headlines shouting that cybersquatting cases are on the rise are a bit misleading.
Post link: Cybersquatting cases are going…down?
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Sedo released their weekly domain name sales and Rete.com led the way at 15,000 Euro, ($17,019). CFPB.com was second at $15,000. Genedecode.com was third at 10,000 GBP, ($13,589). 49 .com sales 24 cctld sales 3 other tld sales Top 3 highlights of public SedoMLS sales are: cfpb.com at 15,000 USD genedecode.comat 10,000 GBP whirly.com […]
The post Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Rete.com appeared first on TheDomains.com.
This case follows the classic “Plan B” reverse domain name hijacking pattern.
A National Arbitration Forum panelist has denied a cybersquatting claim against the domain name gropod.com, but for some reason, didn’t consider if it was a case of reverse domain name hijacking.
According to the decision, the domain owner registered the domain name in 2000 and has used it in commerce. The Complainant’s first rights in the Gropod name date to 2018. Furthermore, the Complainant admitted in the case that it has been trying to acquire the domain. It has offered $1,000; the owner eventually offered to sell it for $20,000.
Based on the published decision, this is a classic “Plan B” reverse domain name hijacking case.
It doesn’t appear that the domain owner was represented by counsel and probably didn’t ask the panelist, Héctor Ariel Manoff, to find reverse domain name hijacking. Still, a panelist should consider it when the details follow this case pattern.
Post link: Why wasn’t this reverse domain name hijacking?
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Sedo domain sales report: Top sale that of Rete.com at 15,000 EUR ($17,000 dollars.) Welcome to the latest domain sales report by Sedo; this time we cover sales week ending on February 21, 2022. This information has been provided by Sedo.com, kind sponsors of DomainGang. The Sedo marketplace sells great domains 24/7 providing a great […]
Copyright DomainGang
Heliponix LLC offered the registrant of the domain Gropod.com $1,000 dollars. The domain was registered in 2000 and for this domain asset its registrant, Groviv LLC, had bigger aspirations so the offer was turned down. Their counter-offer of $20,000 dollars was rejected by Heliponix LLC that had registered the mark GROPOD with the USPTO in […]
Copyright DomainGang
It waited a long time to come after the domain name.
Mexican company Industrias Tamer S.A. DE C.V., aka MIKELS, has failed to convince a World Intellectual Property Organization panelist to award it the domain name mikels.com.
Domain investor Stanley Pace acquired the domain no later than 2009. While the Complainant existed well before that, and UDRP doesn’t generally accept the doctrine of laches, panelist Kaya Köklü noted that the long delay calls the case into question:
Additionally, even if the doctrine of laches may not directly apply to the UDRP, the Panel is of the opinion that the long period of inaction by the Complainant cannot remain unconsidered, particularly as the acquisition of the disputed domain name to the Respondent occurred in the year 2009 (claimed to be 2008 by the Respondent – but ultimately this matters not). In its Complaint, the Complainant was not able to provide convincing arguments for 24 years, respectively 13 years of inaction until the UDRP action was filed.
Mikels noted that the domain owner has been involved in about 40 UDRP cases and has lost many of them. (He has challenged some of them in court.) But the panelist took into consideration that the domain owner owns a lot of domains, which means the number of UDRP cases is relatively small. He also specializes in surnames like Mikels:
Even if the Respondent has been involved in previous UDRP cases and lost a major part of them, the Panel finds that this does not necessarily lead to a finding that the Respondent is generally involved in pattern of mass registration of domain names targeting third parties’ trademark rights in bad faith. The Panel rather believes that at least the present case needs to be assessed individually, particularly as the Respondent has allegedly registered more than 60,000 domain names, including 10,000 comprising family names.
The panelist decided that Mikels failed to show the domain was registered and used in bad faith but declined to find reverse domain name hijacking.
Salvador Camacho Hernández represented the Complainant. Howard Neu represented the domain owner.
Post link: Company fails to upgrade from .com.mx to .com in UDRP
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:Domain buyers contacting registrants of domains for sale have been placing “lowball” offers for years. A common approach is to claim that one is a poor student, working on some kind of “thesis” with a limited budget that can only fund so much of a domain’s asking price. Of course, all this is an attempt […]
Copyright DomainGang
Richard Lau explains his domain pricing strategy and gives an update on his Logo.com venture.
Richard Lau is a long-time domain investor who has left a mark on the industry. He founded (and later sold) NamesCon and has helped connect a charity, The Water School, to the generous domain investment community. On today’s show, Richard explains why he prices all of his domains and why he’s thinking about repricing most of them soon. He also discusses how the psyche of the typical domain buyer has changed over the years. We also talk about Logo.com and how Richard is following a similar modus operandi for this business as he did for resume.com.
Sponsor: Sav.com domain auctions
Subscribe via Apple Podcasts to listen to the Domain Name Wire podcast on your iPhone or iPad, or click play above or download to begin listening. (Listen to previous podcasts here.)
Post link: Talking BINs and logos with Richard Lau – DNW Podcast #376
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:British company UK Intis Telecom LTD, operators of the premium domain It.com, have filed an application for the registration of the matching mark, IT.COM. The mark is applied with an “intend to use” clause for the following services: Domain name registrar services. The mark consists of a stylized arrow above the white stylized wording “it.com” […]
Copyright DomainGang
Five companies are bidding for the contract to run the back-end for South Africa’s .za domains, which is expected to be awarded shortly.
Local ccTLD overseer ZADNA has named ZA Registry Consortium (ZARC), Lexreg and Fevertree Consulting Consortium, GoDaddy Registry, The Bean App & GMO Internet Group, and Catalytic Peter capital Consortium as respondents to its 2021 RFP.
Of those, only GoDaddy is a lone bidder, and the only one without an obvious South African partner. The rest are consortia, apparently newly created to bid for the contract.
ZARC is a venture of incumbent back-end ZA Central Registry and its affiliated commercial arm Domain Name Services, according to ZACR.
Lexreg and Fevertree Consulting Consortium appears to be made up of local corporate registrar Lexsynergy and a South African consulting firm.
The Bean App is a South African startup registrar. Its partner GMO is the Japanese registry provider behind .shop and a bunch of geographic and dot-brand gTLDs.
I’m sorry to say I have no idea what “Catalytic Peter” is. It has no internet footprint and ZADNA has not revealed any information beyond the name.
ZADNA said it is “currently at the advanced stage of the final checkpoints of the procurement process.”
.za has over 1.3 million domains and over 600 registrars. While ZACR currently runs four additional African geographic gTLDs, .za is by far its biggest deal in terms of registrations.
The post GoDaddy among five companies competing for .za contract first appeared on Domain Incite.
Related posts:A Chinese registrar group has been accused by ICANN of shirking its UDRP obligations for the second time this year.
ICANN has put Hong Kong-based DomainName Highway on notice that is in breach of its contract for failing to transfer the domain 1ockheedmartin.com to defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
The domain is a straightforward case of typosquatting, with the initial L replaced with a numeral 1. At time of writing, it still resolves to a page of pornographic thumbnail links, despite being lost in a UDRP case January 4.
Under UDRP rules, registrars have 10 days to transfer a UDRP-losing domain to the trademark owner, unless a lawsuit prevents it.
The circumstances are very similar to a breach notice ICANN issued against ThreadAgent.com over a case of BMW’s brand being cybersquatted with porn last month.
Both ThreadAgent and DomainName Highway appear to be part of the XZ.com, aka Xiamen DianMedia Network Technology Co, which is based in China but has about 20 accredited registrars based in Hong Kong.
DomainName Highway has about 30,000 gTLD domains under management.
The post Registrar hit with second porn UDRP breach notice this year first appeared on Domain Incite.
Related posts:The DAN marketplace has been rolling out improved features, many of which were requested by its domain-selling user base. Note: DAN.com is a premium sponsor. Built for fast, efficient sales, DAN.com receives positive comments on its TrustPilot profile, with a 4.7 out of 5 score. One recent comment, however, is negative and delivers 1 star […]
Copyright DomainGang
GreatDomains, the bi-monthly auction by Sedo—our premium sponsor—is on! Featuring 264 hand-curated domain names, the current GreatDomains auction takes place from February 17th to the 24th. For the past 15 years, the GreatDomains auction has achieved millions of dollars in domain sales; take a look at the Top 20 sales by GreatDomains. As always, we […]
Copyright DomainGang
They’re coming. Eventually.
In 2009, I attended a SedoPro event in Key West, Florida. We talked a bit about the imminent arrival of new top level domain names on one of the panels. Antony Van Couvering, who founded new TLD company Minds + Machines, lamented that he had been working on new TLDs since the early aughts.
It would be another couple of years after that discussion before Van Couvering and other companies could apply for the domains, and still another couple before they saw the light of day.
So here we are again, chattering about another round of new top level domains. We’re nudging forward to the next round, even if it’s still going to be a while. Expect a bit of progress at next month’s virtual ICANN 73 meeting.
The Prep Week Schedule (ICANN Registration & sign-in required to view) has a session commemorating the 10th anniversary (yes, ten) of the New gTLD Program, hosted by the Registries Stakeholder Group on February 23.
The upcoming meeting will likely include news about the development of subsequent procedures for the next round of new TLD applications. Referred to as “SubPro,” the project to improve the Applicant Guidebook, evaluation process, and rules for the next round has been going on since 2016. It is now in the Operational Design Phase, where ICANN will assess how to implement the recommendations from the SubPro final report.
Those recommendations are not revolutionary. The recommendations from the report mainly emphasize predictability and transparency in the planning of subsequent application rounds. Private and ICANN-run auctions among applicants for the same string, a bone of contention for some, are still going to be allowed.
One notable recommended improvement is the pre-evaluation of Registry Service Providers (RSP), which are the technical and operational backend providers for domain registries. In the 2012 round, portfolio applicants like Donuts had to submit documentation dozens of times for identical technical evaluations, one for each TLD they applied for. The pre-evaluation process would allow them to go through the process once. It would also let applicants avoid their own technical evaluation by using a pre-approved RSP.
We are likely in for more years of “hurry up and wait” for the next round of TLDs. But it might be time for those interested in applying for a new TLD to start paying attention as ICANN works on its plans for the next round.
In the meantime, I need to start thinking about what to call the “old” new TLDs when the new ones arrive.
Post link: Time to pay attention to the next round of new TLDs?
© DomainNameWire.com 2022. This is copyrighted content. Domain Name Wire full-text RSS feeds are made available for personal use only, and may not be published on any site without permission. If you see this message on a website, contact editor (at) domainnamewire.com. Latest domain news at DNW.com: Domain Name Wire.
Related posts:When you need to create a repository of puppies available online, you might want to call it “Puppies dot com.” But what if the matching domain, Puppies.com, had been registered a full seven years prior? Very simple: You register Puppies-dot-com.com. The domain advertised itself as Puppies dot com throughout: The business lasted until 2016 and […]
Copyright DomainGang
A geozone is a virtual boundary formed around a physical location that handles specific traffic and data within that location. A geozone is created as part of a larger network, such as a mobile mesh, that provides location aware data to any device within the borders. Source: WyldNetworks. The matching domain name, Geozone.com, was auctioned […]
Copyright DomainGang
No longer to be known as Canvas at Canvas.com, a company whose rented domain gave it trouble performs domain rebranding, once again. In May 2021, a recruiting company known as “Jumpstart” at the time, decided to beef up its brand and domain. For that purpose, they leased the domain Canvas.com, switching to “Canvas” as their […]
Copyright DomainGang
Domain Magnate update Interested in expanding your portfolio of websites or looking for an investment opportunity? We have a number of sites for sale with strong growth potential. All sales include a free transfer by our team and help with the setup of your affiliate IDs and ad codes. Contact us for more details. This week we had... Read more »
The post DM Industry News 17th February: Optimise your site’s earnings! appeared first on Domain Magnate.
Indeed, Inc. is the world’s largest job site, with over 200 million unique visitors every month from over 60 different countries. The UDRP filed against the domain name Brindeed.com was triggered by a common practice, that of subdomain squatting. Indeed uses subdomains for its regional web sites and in the case of this UDRP filing […]
Copyright DomainGang